The Jude 3 Project | Featuring Humble Hermeneutic (Dr. Cynthia James and Yana Connor) | 7 min read
You have read the passage a hundred times. You are sure you know what it says. And then someone from a completely different background reads it alongside you, and they see something you never noticed. Not because they are a better scholar. Because they are standing in a different place.
That experience, common to anyone who has read Scripture in community for long enough, is exactly what Dr. Cynthia James and Yana Connor are pointing to when they talk about interpretive humility. It is not a softer version of conviction. It is the honest acknowledgment that the Bible is bigger than any one reader who comes to it.
James and Connor host Humble Hermeneutic, a Jude 3 Project podcast dedicated to what it means to read God's word carefully, humbly, and well. Their first episode takes on the most foundational question in the series: before method, before genre analysis, before any of the technical work, what posture does the text require of the reader?
What does hermeneutics actually mean?
Hermeneutics is the study and method of interpretation. In a biblical context, it covers the questions a careful reader brings to any text: what does it say, what does it mean in its context, and how does it speak to us now? Observation, interpretation, and application are the three main stages most hermeneutics teachers use.
But Connor and James are making a point that comes before all of that. Before you ask what the text means, you have to decide how you are going to hold your conclusion once you reach it. And that prior decision, that posture, is what humility addresses.
The goal, as Connor puts it directly, is not to master the Bible but to be mastered by it. That reorientation changes everything about how a person reads.
What does interpretive arrogance actually cost you?
James uses a vivid image. When a reader approaches Scripture already convinced they have it figured out, they narrow the doorway. The same passage that comforted you at twenty will speak differently at forty. That is not the text changing. That is the text being larger than any single reading at any single stage of life.
"If I don't approach it with that…I limit my own bandwidth. I narrow the pathway into my life as well as going out." — Dr. Cynthia James
This is not a case for doctrinal uncertainty. It is a case against treating your current reading as the final word. Proof-texting, the practice of lifting verses out of context to support conclusions already reached, is the most visible symptom of interpretive arrogance. You already know what you are looking for. The text becomes a database to search rather than a voice to hear.
Esau McCaulley, whose work on reading Scripture as a Black Christian has reshaped how many think about interpretation, makes a related point. He asks readers a blunt question before they dismiss a difficult passage: "Have I studied it or have I simply memed it?" That question is not just for people rejecting the Bible. It applies equally to people defending it. Confidence built on a meme is not confidence built on the text.
Can you still trust the Bible if you hold it with humility?
This is the most common objection, and James addresses it head-on. Humility in interpretation is not the same as uncertainty about what the Bible teaches. She describes coming to the text with reverence, genuine confidence that questions can be asked and examined and tested, and at the same time, full awareness that no reader has the whole picture.
"We must come to it with the respect, with the regard, but yet with the confidence that we can ask questions about it, that we can even doubt it and examine it and pull it apart and seek to put it back together again. But all with the consciousness that we don't know it all, that we haven't seen it all." — Dr. Cynthia James
That is not a weak position. It is actually what good scholarship has always looked like. The scholars who have contributed most to biblical understanding have consistently been the ones willing to say: I could be wrong about this, and here is why I hold it anyway.
Sherelle Ducksworth, in the Courageous Conversations curriculum produced by the Jude 3 Project, frames it from the opposite angle: "any misinterpretation of the Bible is a user error and not an error in the Bible itself." That framing protects the text's authority while holding the reader accountable. The Bible does not fail the reader; the reader, reading without humility, fails to receive what the text is actually offering.
What does a lifetime of humble reading actually look like?
James tells a story that grounds all of this in practice. She describes reading the Psalms as a child, under the covers with a flashlight, finding in those songs something she could not yet articulate. She describes seasons of doubt, seasons when she drifted, and finding the word again like a guardrail when she needed it. The text was not just doctrine across those years. It was, in her words, a companion, a place of solace, a place of sanctuary.
That kind of long-term relationship with Scripture is only possible for someone who has not decided they already understand it. Humility is what sustains curiosity across a lifetime of reading. A reader who has arrived stops really reading.
Connor connects this to sanctification, the lifelong process of growing into what God is making you. Readers are always journeying. The text keeps speaking because the reader keeps changing, and the reader keeps changing because the text keeps speaking. Arrogance breaks that loop.
"We're humble because we are lessened knowing that we are before something that is so great." — Dr. Cynthia James
Why does this matter for apologetics?
The Jude 3 Project exists, in part, to help people defend their faith well. And interpretive humility is not the enemy of that project. It is the foundation of it.
A reader who holds their interpretations with appropriate openness is a better conversation partner with someone who doubts. They are not threatened by hard questions because they have practiced sitting with hard questions themselves. They know the difference between a question that destabilizes their faith and a question that the text has the resources to answer, even if the answer takes time.
A reader who has decided they have already arrived at the final interpretation of everything is actually a fragile apologist. Their certainty is load-bearing in ways they may not realize. When something wobbles, everything wobbles.
McCaulley puts it this way: "It is rare that that sense of unease is greater than the confidence that I have that the tomb was empty on the third day." That is a model worth following. Hold the resurrection with full confidence. Hold your interpretation of a contested passage with the humility of someone who knows they are still learning.
Quick answers
- What is hermeneutics? The study and method of interpretation. In a biblical context, it covers observation, interpretation, and application. But before any of that comes the posture: how you approach the text.
- Does interpretive humility mean I can't be confident? No. Humility in interpretation is not doctrinal uncertainty. It means holding your current reading with the awareness that the text is bigger than any single reader.
- What is the danger of proof-texting? It treats Scripture as a database to search rather than a voice to hear. It arrives with conclusions and looks for support rather than asking what the text says.
- Can you love the Bible and still question it? James says yes. Questions, doubts, and hard examination are consistent with deep reverence, as long as they are held with awareness that the text precedes and exceeds the reader.
- What does it mean to be mastered by Scripture rather than to master it? It means letting the text set the agenda: returning to the same passages over years, staying open to what they say, and resisting the pull to confirm only what you already believe.
Listen to the full conversation
This is the first episode of Humble Hermeneutic, a Jude 3 Project podcast hosted by Dr. Cynthia James and Yana Connor. The full conversation is at: https://humblehermeneutic.podbean.com/e/why-do-we-need-humility-when-interpreting-the-bible/
Dr. Cynthia James holds a doctorate and has spent decades as a student and teacher of Scripture. Yana Connor is a Bible teacher and educator whose approach to hermeneutics was shaped by both formal training and early mentorship in inductive Bible study. Together they host the Humble Hermeneutic podcast, a Jude 3 Project show exploring what it means to read God's word carefully, humbly, and well.