The Bible is the white man's book. They handed it to our ancestors to keep them in line. That charge is made in sharper and softer forms, and it rests on a real memory. In the Americas, many enslaved Africans first met the Bible through the people who held them in bondage. The reasoning that follows is direct. People decided which writings belonged in the book. If those people, or their heirs, were the enslavers, then the book may be a record of their power and not a word from God.
The historical record answers the charge clearly. The decisive choices about which writings counted were made long before any European empire touched them. Many were made by Jewish scribes and by African and Middle Eastern Christians, and much of the work happened while Christians held no power anywhere. Enslavers misused a book they did not assemble. That history leaves some questions open at the edges, and history alone cannot prove the Bible is God's word. It does mean the power explanation fails where it matters most.
The movements below take the charge apart and test each piece against its own evidence: the lost originals and the copying, the translations, and the selection of books. The witnesses are scholars who have spoken with Jude 3 Project, quoted in their own words. The skill being built is the one the charge itself demands, telling apart what a text says from what its handlers did with it. By the end you should be able to state the suspicion fairly, say where it is right, and say where the evidence runs against it.